GPT-6 Astra · Creative workflows

Build a Landing Page with GPT-6 Astra: From Reference to Responsive Design

Broad and slender folded-paper architectural frames arrange amber, cobalt and terracotta forms
Original abstract editorial illustration created for this guide.

A convincing landing page needs more than a good screenshot. The headline has to remain readable on a phone, the primary action has to work and the product claims have to survive the design process unchanged. Give Astra those requirements alongside your reference image.

This guide includes an original responsive page for the fictional Still lamp. It uses the editorial image from our image-prompt guide and live HTML text. The example is a locally verified teaching artifact, not a timed or controlled Astra generation test.

Translate the reference into a brief

Describe the hierarchy you want to preserve: brand, headline, supporting sentence, primary action and hero image. Explain whether the reference is about typography, spacing, color or composition. Without that distinction, an agent may copy details that were incidental to the direction.

Give it the approved product facts separately. For Still, we use fictional descriptive copy and a specifications disclosure. There is no checkout, fabricated review score or invented inventory counter. A production page needs real product facts and a real action destination before launch.

Reference-to-page handoff
InputSpecifyVerify
Art directionPalette, type hierarchy and spacing rhythmThe page follows the intended hierarchy
Product imageSubject and crop prioritiesThe subject remains visible on mobile
CopyApproved headline and factual claimsNo invented prices or testimonials
Primary actionDestination or exact interactionMouse and keyboard behavior

Keep text and controls separate from the image

The Still hero image leaves room for copy, but the headline lives in HTML. That allows it to reflow, remain selectable and be corrected without rerendering the lamp. The button is a real control with a visible result, not a rectangle painted into the artwork.

A desktop composition can become unreadable if you simply shrink it to phone width. Let the text and image stack when needed. Keep the product's important details inside the crop and check that the first meaningful action remains easy to find.

Working Still landing-page example with editable headline, terracotta lamp hero and a product-details control
Screenshot of the original responsive tutorial page. The lamp is an AI-generated editorial illustration; the text and controls are HTML.

Ask for implementation and inspection together

Specify a runnable preview and the widths to inspect. Ask the agent to use the project's existing framework and components where appropriate. If you are working in an established site, a new page should not silently introduce a second design system or unnecessary dependency.

A focused prompt also states what the page is allowed to do. For a prototype, an honest details disclosure is enough. For a lead-generation page, connect the form to the intended destination and test that behavior before making it public.

Example prompt: responsive campaign page
Implement one responsive landing page from the attached Still brief and approved hero image. Keep headline and body copy as editable HTML. Use the existing project conventions. At desktop width, preserve the quiet composition; at 390px, stack content without horizontal overflow or hiding the lamp. The primary control opens product details and can be used by keyboard. Include visible focus states and meaningful image alt text. Inspect both widths and test the control. Do not invent claims, prices, reviews or a checkout.

Compare the result at two widths

Start with the reading order. On desktop, can you see the headline and understand the action before scanning decorative details? On mobile, does the order still make sense? Look for overly long lines, clipped text, awkward image crops and buttons pushed far away from their explanation.

A source screenshot can guide appearance, but it cannot answer those interaction questions. The community discussion below captures that uncertainty: frontend quality depends on matching a particular style and delivering working behavior, not merely generating valid HTML.

Test the control and the page's honest boundaries

Use Tab to reach the primary control and activate it with the keyboard. Confirm its visible state and that the content it reveals can be read. Resize the page and repeat. Check that focus remains visible against the chosen palette.

The Still example explicitly identifies itself as fictional and its details as illustrative. That label matters because a polished design can look like a real storefront. When adapting it, replace the sample facts with verified information and wire the action to your actual product flow.

Pre-handoff checks
CheckEvidence
Responsive layoutDesktop and mobile screenshots without clipping
Image deliveryImage loads; subject survives the crop
KeyboardVisible focus and working primary control
ClaimsEvery product statement has an approved source
HandoffRunnable files and known unfinished integrations

Improve the weakest part in the next revision

If the layout is sound but the visual lacks identity, revise the image brief. If the image is strong but the headline hierarchy is weak, fix the page. Treating every defect as a reason to regenerate the entire design makes it harder to preserve what already works.

For a campaign with several landing-page variants, keep the approved asset set and copy decisions in a shared brief. Ciyo can help create the visual variations; responsive behavior and conversion tracking belong to the implementation and should be checked separately.

Put your visual brief to work

Use Ciyo to create campaign visuals with the crop, composition and copy space your landing page needs.