GPT-6 Astra · Image prompts

GPT-6 Astra Image Prompts: Score the First Result Before You Rewrite

An ivory ceramic vase inside a thin graphite frame, with four small markers along the base and one of them amber
Original abstract editorial artwork inspired by checking a result against a short list.

When an image is not quite right, the usual reaction is to rewrite the whole prompt. That throws away what worked and often introduces new problems. A better habit is to score the result against a short brief, name the failed point, and change only that.

We tested this with two social images for a fictional café on September 19, 2026. One passed every point; the other failed one. The screenshots show Astra's actual verdicts and the fixed result.

Write the brief as checks

Before you judge an image, write four or five points that can pass or fail: the hero product, where text will go, the palette, what must not appear. Vague goals such as 'make it pop' cannot be scored.

Brief used for the café story image
PointPass when
HeroThe latte is the clear focus
Text spaceThe bottom fifth is clear for one line
PhotographThe whole frame reads as one natural photo
PaletteCream, lavender and honey gold
CleanNo text or logos

Let a pass be a pass

Our first image, a square feed photo of a honey-lavender latte, was scored against four points. Astra marked all four as passing, gave a reason for each, and recommended no changes. It also suggested testing the real headline in the space before deciding on any revision.

That is a useful outcome. Without the checklist, many people would regenerate a good image out of habit and pay for a worse one.

The Ciyo workspace with a latte photo on the canvas and GPT-6 Astra's four-row pass table in the chat panel
All four points passed for the feed image, so no rewrite was needed.

Name the one point that failed

The second image was a 9:16 story. Our prompt asked for the bottom fifth to stay plain for a line of text, and the model delivered a flat cream band with a hard edge across the frame.

Astra scored it 4 of 5. The failed point was 'one natural photograph': the band read as an added footer, not part of the scene. The text space itself passed.

The Ciyo workspace with a vertical latte story image that has a flat cream band at the bottom, and GPT-6 Astra's list marking point 3 as failed
Astra's verdict on the story image: one failed point, with the reason.
Scoring request
Score the selected story image against my brief before I post it: (1) the latte is the clear hero, (2) the bottom fifth is clear enough for one line of text, (3) the whole frame reads as one natural photograph, (4) cream, lavender and honey-gold palette, (5) no text or logos. Mark each point pass or fail with the reason. If anything fails, rewrite the prompt to fix only the failed points and keep what passed. Do not generate yet.

Fix the failure with one edit

Astra's rewrite changed only the failed point: replace the disconnected band and its seam with a natural surface, and keep the latte, hand, window, lavender, palette and clear bottom area. Because the rest of the image passed, we applied it as a Quick Edit on the existing image rather than a new generation. The Run button showed 4 credits.

Quick Edit instruction
Make this read as one continuous natural photograph. Replace only the flat cream band at the bottom and its hard seam with a cream café tabletop that continues the scene, with believable perspective and the same warm window light. Keep the bottom fifth quiet and clear for one line of text. Keep the latte, hand, window, lavender and palette unchanged. No text, logos, panels or borders.

Score the fix too

The edit replaced the band with a round marble café table that continues the scene, and the latte, hand and window stayed the same. The seam was gone.

One new issue appeared: the tabletop has dappled window shadows, so the bottom area is busier than the flat band. It still has room for text, but you should check contrast with your real line of text, or add a soft solid box behind it.

The Ciyo canvas with the original story image and flat band on the left and the edited version with a marble café table on the right
Before and after the one-point fix, September 19, 2026.

Use the same loop for every image

Brief as checks, score, change only what failed, score again. The loop is short, and each step leaves a record of why the image changed.

Other creators describe the same discipline for sequences. On September 18, 2026, @dwarffy_ advised keeping the scene description locked and changing only what is new, and treating a sudden change in a frame as prompt drift. That post is about image sequences in another tool; the scoring table here is our own adaptation.

Prompt scoring questions

What if every point passes?

Keep the image. In our feed example all four points passed and Astra recommended no rewrite.

Should I regenerate or edit after a fail?

If most points passed, edit the existing image and change only the failed point. Regenerate when the main subject or layout failed.

Can GPT-6 Astra see my image?

It reviewed the selected image on the canvas in our run. For fine print or tiny details, check the full-size file yourself.

Score your next image

Write your brief as checks and let GPT-6 Astra score the first result in Ciyo.